A dear friend of mine is a retired Admiral. He made a statement that sticks in my mind. He said, “An admiral’s responsibility is not to be political, his duty is to protect the people.”
I feel the same about protecting the people I love and their freedoms. Truthfully, I am exhausted by the corruption and politics on par with the most devastating pandemic in my life time. The politics traumatize me.
Some data has emerged that may be worth your time. The allegation is that the technology for our elections has been compromised…for years.
What this means is that the future of your vote is compromised and your freedom.
I am not endorsing any candidate or party. They all disturb me deeply. You are my concern. The compassion I feel is about you.
This is a video link (please click on the home button at the bottom of this blog) high lighting what seems credible data about election technology. This is public domain content. If proved illegitimate, I will be the first to get on board. If the data is legitimate, then we have some work to do for our children and grandchildren.
I am endorsing no political platform or personality. My mind cannot permit me to do so. If you choose to click on the home button, can you think about your vote in the next election? Your children?
Here are some of my concerns, perhaps you may share them. Is there a rebuttal to this data on the failure of voting tech? Why are other platforms not responding to the allegations? Can we hear from other sources which can either lend credibility or begin a process of refuting these claims without using the conspiracy card?
I am not publishing comments so my friends will be protected from abuse. For those who may think I am supporting a specific candidate, I am not. However the truth lands, that is where I will make my home. If these allegations of voting technology failure are true, the court system will take several years to hear the allegations and rule. However, if the courts do find this technology is flawed, your vote and your children’s freedom may be secured.
In this video, I am sorry for the presenter. He is sincere, but it is hard for me to listen to him because behind his platform is an economy to sell his products. Is he posturing for personal gain? The video platform is a concern too. The media source gives me anxiety and triggers deeper warning signals of bias. The titles disturb me. The presenter is selling a book. These are all concerns and I acknowledge my dissent.
I welcome other media sources to contribute and I will post rebuttals to this data.
However the truth lands. I am ok with it. As of today, this post has not been censored. I did notice a friend attempted to post this video on social media and she was censored by the creators of the platform. Can the censors present credible data to refute this? If not…why?
After surviving one hateful outrage to my post, another friend asked to view the video contents. She stated that the presenter is “crazy”. I cannot vouch for his crazy but he is hard to listen to. He may not be crazy but I certainly feel awkward watching his show. My friend said she saw a New York Times rebuttal to the voting technology concerns so I followed that up today.
The New York Times followed up voting technology allegations with an article on November 16, 2020 citing 59 computer scientists who stated,
“To our collective knowledge, no credible evidence” that the election was rigged has been presented, 59 computer scientists and election security experts wrote in a public letter.”
Bryan Anselm for The New York Times https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/16/business/election-security-letter-trump.html?auth=login-facebook
Then I saw this article dated February 2, 2018 by the New York Times stating that the voting technology is susceptible to fraud. The article cites that “official results” can be altered.
” …attackers could theoretically intercept unofficial results as they’re transmitted on election night — or, worse, use the modem connections to reach back into election machines at either end and install malware or alter election software and official results.” https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/21/magazine/the-myth-of-the-hacker-proof-voting-machine.html
I believe the New York Times. On November 16, 2020 59 computer scientists did not have enough data to determine voting machine failure. I also believe the New York Times when they report that voting technology can be manipulated. Also, in the New York Times archive search engine I could not locate the 2018 article citing potential liability and failure with voting technology. Did they remove their own article?
Let’s keep working on this. Be kind. Slander no one. Show compassion. My concern is your vote in the next election.
I am not supporter of the presenter, I do feel at this point he may have some content that can effect your vote in coming elections.
Hope Experience 